Homeland Security and Innovation Center (HSIC) - Executive Education Seminar Services

Updated Oct 28, 2026

Sources Sought from the Department of the Army. Due Nov 11, 2026, 5:00 PM (UTC-5), 14 days left.

Bid documents (1)

• HSIC Performance Work Statement Draft 36 KB

Paid members download every document from this page, or buy this bid alone.

Description

HSIC, located at Joint Force Headquarters–Massachusetts, supports the National Guard by connecting senior-leader education with the evolving challenges of homeland security, emergency management, crisis leadership, and innovation. Its education mission includes General and Flag Officer Seminar (GFOS) and Leadership in Homeland Security (LHS) audiences. The seminars emphasize rigorous academic study, case-based analysis, facilitated discussion, critical thinking, and peer networking in a university setting.

The curriculum should address National Guard roles in complex domestic response and intergovernmental coordination and, as appropriate to each seminar, emerging challenges such as artificial intelligence, cyber threats, small unmanned aircraft systems/counter-sUAS, and innovation. Inclusion and emphasis of these topics remain subject to HSIC/GOMO mission validation. The broader HSIC innovation/incubation mission does not automatically expand the scope of this seminar-services requirement.

MARKET RESEARCH FEEDBACK REQUESTED Institutions are invited to comment on academic capability, delivery and pricing feasibility, and requirements that may unnecessarily constrain participation. Responses should identify the affected section, explain the practical or financial impact, and propose alternatives that preserve HSIC educational quality. Contracting will determine final response instructions.

Academic institution and faculty qualifications: experience educating GOs or comparable senior executives; relevant faculty credentials; impact of tenured-Ph.D./ten-year criteria. GFOS and LHS differentiation: recommended objectives, topics, and approaches appropriate to each audience; capability to address AI, cyber, sUAS/cUAS, and innovation. Case-study pedagogy and research: existing course adaptation, case-study counts, original case development, guest speaker access, realistic research and approval timelines.

Seminar capacity, location, and duration: in-person facilities for 65 plus support staff; viable course lengths; scheduling lead times; capacity for multiple annual iterations. Enrollment and pricing: ability to handle 40 Government-funded and up to 25 direct-pay seats; tuition-only versus standard bundled seminar pricing; minimum cohort sizes. Intellectual property: rights and restrictions for pre-existing materials versus Government-funded new case studies; possible licensing and reuse models.

Participation barriers: federal contracting, administrative requirements, location, security, teaming, and any provisions that materially affect willingness or ability to compete. TARGETED UNIVERSITY FEEDBACK QUESTIONS — ACADEMIC AND BUSINESS FEASIBILITY Which performance outcomes and academic quality indicators best demonstrate that an executive education program meets HSIC needs?

Which specific faculty criteria, if any, would prevent your institution from competing, and what evidence of equivalent academic quality could you provide? What case-study-based instructional model would you propose, and how would HSIC verify the quality of learning? What enrollment, lead time, and annual frequency would make participation financially viable for your institution?

How would your institution price standard bundled tuition, meals, books, and facilities compared with a tuition-only arrangement, if available? Which administrative or payment requirements (including direct-pay seats and federal contracting) would discourage a response, and what alternatives could address them? Based on this draft PWS, what specific requirements or business conditions would discourage your institution from competing?

Would your institution be interested in competing? If not, what changes would materially affect that decision? SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS & INSTRUCTIONS Interested academic institutions who believe they have the capability to perform this requirement are invited to submit their feedback and Capability Statement.

Please refer to the attached draft Performance Work Statement (PWS) (File: HSIC_PWS_Draft.docx) when compiling their responses. To be considered complete, the submission package MUST contain:

1. Administrative Profile (including UEI and CAGE Code)
2. Technical Capabilities Narrative
3. Comments on the 7 Market Research Feedback Areas
4. Direct Answers to the 8 Targeted University Feedback Questions Please ensure the email subject line reads: "Sources Sought Response: W912SV27SS0001 - HSIC Executive Education Seminar Services" Responses must be submitted via email to the following points of contact: Primary POC: Marc Kerrigan ([email protected]) Alternative POC: Isao Hattori ([email protected]) Please note that no phone calls or inquiries will be accepted or acknowledged regarding this market survey. Disclaimer this sources sought notice is for informational and planning purposes only. This is not a request for proposal (RFP), request for quotation (RFQ), or invitation for bid (IFB). It does not constitute a solicitation and shall not be construed as a commitment by the Government (RFO FAR 15.101(c)). Responses in any form are not offers and cannot be accepted by the Government to form a binding contract. The Government is under no obligation to award a contract as a result of this announcement. No funds are available to pay for the preparation of responses to this announcement, and all costs associated with responding will be solely at the interested party’S expense. Any information submitted by respondents is strictly voluntary. Not responding to this notice does not preclude participation in any future solicitation, if issued. If a solicitation is released, it will be SYNOPSIZED on the Government-wide point of entry (SAM.GOV). It is the potential OFFEROR'S responsibility to monitor this site for the release of any solicitation.

Contracting contact

• Marc Kerrigan · [email protected]
• Isao Hattori · [email protected]

As published on the official notice. Ask questions in writing and before any questions deadline the notice sets.

Is your business small enough?

For NAICS 611310, a business counts as small if it has no more than $34.5 million in average annual receipts (SBA size standard). This notice is set aside, so only businesses under that size, or in the named program, can bid. SBA table, current as of Oct 15, 2026.

Companies that win this kind of work

Federal contractors paid for colleges, universities, and professional schools work, who also hold Army contracts (last 12 months): possible competitors, or partners to team with.

• The Trustees Of Princeton University $195.8 million in this trade
• University Of Utah $6.6 million in this trade
• University Of Southern California $6.1 million in this trade
• Purdue University $4.6 million in this trade
• University Of Washington $4.6 million in this trade

About the buyer

The Department of the Army awarded $84.6 billion in contracts in the last 12 months; its biggest suppliers were Lockheed Martin Corporation, Raytheon Company and The Boeing Company. See what Army is buying now.

Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools contracts right now

There are 4 open government contract opportunities in this trade (NAICS 611310), 3 posted in the last 7 days; 75% are set aside for small businesses. The agencies buying the most are Department of the Army, Department of the Air Force and Department of the Navy. Most of the work with a stated place is in Texas.

All open colleges, universities, and professional schools contracts

Coming up in this trade

Planned contracts from the agencies' procurement forecasts, often months before a solicitation. Plans can change.

Similar open colleges, universities, and professional schools bids