Home / NAWCAD (WOLF) Airborne Systems Integration (ASI ) Division… / Document

Att M1 - ASI TPMS FAR 16.507-2

Updated

A PDF document (538 KB) attached to NAWCAD (WOLF) Airborne Systems Integration (ASI ) Division Technical/Project Management Support (TPMS), from the Department of the Navy. Due Dec 15, 2026, 1:00 PM (UTC-5).

File name: Att M1 - ASI TPMS FAR 16.507-2.pdf

Download the full documentSee the bid

The full file is for paid members, or buy this bid alone.

Preview

N00421-27-R-1008
Attachment M1

ATTACHMENT M1 – EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD (SEP 2026)

PART A – GENERAL INFORMATION

1.0 BASIS FOR AWARD

1.1 The Government intends to make a fair opportunity selection in accordance with FAR 16.507-2 and award one Task Order (TO) to the responsible Contractor whose Offer conforms to the Request for Offer (RFO).
1.2 The award will be made to the Contractor determined to have the Highest Technically Ranked Offer (HTRO), provided that the HTRO achieves an assigned Past Performance confidence rating of 'Neutral Confidence' or higher, and the proposed Cost/Price is determined fair and reasonable, realistic, and balanced.
1.3 Technical ranking determines the HTRO. Initially, Past Performance and Cost/Price will be evaluated only for the HTRO.
1.4 The evaluation approach permits a best-value tradeoff only if the HTRO (or the next highest technically ranked eligible Offer being evaluated for award) receives a Past Performance confidence rating of 'Limited Confidence' or 'No Confidence'. In such an event, the Government will evaluate the Past Performance and Cost/Price of the next highest technically ranked Offer(s). The tradeoff will then be conducted across the Technical, Past Performance, and Cost/Price factors between the two eligible evaluated Offers to determine which Offer represents the best overall value to the Government.

2.0 EVALUATION PROCESS

2.1 This TO competition is a streamlined evaluation conducted under FAR 16.507-2 and does not use the formal source selection procedures of FAR Subpart 15.2. Accordingly: 


Competitive range determinations are not required
Competitive Negotiations as defined in FAR 15.204-2 will not occur Pre-award debriefings and pre-award notifications of exclusion prior to award are not required and the Government will not provide them
Terminology similar to FAR 15.2 does not imply application of FAR 15.2 procedures

2.2 The Government will afford all Contractors a fair opportunity to submit an Offer. Initial Offers must represent the Contractor’s best terms and pricing. 2.3 The Government may conduct oral or written interchanges at any time during the evaluation with one, some, all, or none of the Contractors to:


Clarify understanding of requirements
Enhance the Government’s understanding of the Offer
Resolve errors or omissions

N00421-27-R-1008
Attachment M1

Finalize TO terms
Obtain other information to facilitate the Government’s ability to evaluate the Offer and

The beginning of the document. Download the full file to read on.

Other documents in this bid