Attachment 2: Performance Assessment Questionnaire

Performance Assessment Questionnaire – Cover Letter

DEPARTMENT OF WAR

U.S. ARMY MISSION AND INSTALLATION CONTRACTING COMMAND

FORT LEONARD WOOD

8112 NEBRASKA AVENUE, BLDG 11400

FORT LEONARD WOOD, MO 65473-8944

14 October 2026

SUBJECT: Offeror Past Performance Assessment in Support of Request for Proposal

(RFP) W911S727RA002

Dear Sir/Ma’am,
The US Armyy Mission Installation Contracting Command , Fort Leonard Wood is currently conducting a competitive source selection to evaluate offerors on the subject RFP. As part of this evaluation, we have requested that the offerors provide information about their past performance on same or similar federal, state, or local government or commercial contracts as compared to the North American Industry Classification System [NAICS] 611519. You have been identified as the point of contact cited on the enclosure.
Your assessment of their performance is extremely valuable to our evaluation. Please complete the enclosure and return to Crystal S. Hytower email at [email protected] no later than 15 days after receipt of request or 13 November 2026, whichever occurs first.
Your cooperation is greatly appreciated. Questions may be directed to the undersigned at [email protected] .
Sincerely,

ALFREDA M. DUPONT

Contracting Officer

Performance Assessment Questionnaire
Please provide your candid responses. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of federal contracts. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual, accurate and complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up by the evaluators. If you do not have knowledge of or experience with the company in question, please forward this Questionnaire to the person who does (and/or) notify the Contracting Officer. Please return the completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter within the stated timeframe. Rating Definitions:
Substantial Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. The offeror has been highly successfully in performing the required effort. Satisfactory Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. The offeror