Attachment 3 52.212-2 Evaluation APS

Attachment 03: FAR 52.212-2 Evaluation Criteria for Agile Professional Services Solicitation W900KK-26-R-A023

52.212-2 Evaluation—Commercial Products and Commercial Services. As prescribed in 12.301(c), the Contracting Officer may insert a provision substantially as follows:
Evaluation—Commercial Products and Commercial Services (Nov 2021) (a) The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible Offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The Government intends to evaluate proposals and select the best-value Offeror using a Three-Phased evaluation approach under the commercial services procedures of FAR 52.212-2 “Evaluation – Commercial Products and Commercial Services”. Volume 1 - Factor 1 – Technical
Subfactor 1.a – Agile Implementation Plan
Subfactor 1.b – Key Personnel
Subfactor 1.c – Cybersecurity Compliance Gate
Subfactor 1.d - Technical Presentation and Agile Scenarios – •
•

Part 1 - Implementation and Alignment with Subfactor 1.a – Agile Implementation Plan and SOO Oral Presentation Slides
Part 2 - Oral Presentation with Government provided Scenario Injects

Subfactor 1.e - Proposed Performance Work Statement (PWS), CDRLs and Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP)
Subfactor 1.f – Transition Plan
Compliance Matrix (Not Evaluated)
Volume 2 - Factor 2 – Organizational Conflict of Interest (OCI) Mitigation Plan Volume 3 - Factor 3 – Cost/Price
Evaluation Procedures: The evaluation phases are structured as follows: To receive an overall Acceptable rating for the Agile Professional Services Source Selection, an Offeror must submit all three sequential phases and receive an Acceptable rating on every single factor and subfactor. A single Unacceptable rating at any point renders the entire technical submission Non-Compliant. Multi-Phased Source Selection Procedures: The Government will utilize a multiphased source selection procedure for the Agile Professional Services Source Selection. Offerors must submit sequential deliverables where each subsequent phase

Attachment 03: FAR 52.212-2 Evaluation Criteria for Agile Professional Services Solicitation W900KK-26-R-A023

directly builds upon the previous submissions. A complete submittal consists of cumulative submissions from Phase I, Phase II, and Phase III. During the evaluation, each individual subfactor assessed throughout these phases will receive a rating of either Acceptable or Unacceptable.