Attachment 3: PPIQ
Updated
A Word document (149 KB) attached to U.S. Embassy Mexico—International Narcotics & Law Enforcement Affairs (INL Mexico) CONOCER Criminal Analyst Certification Services, from the Department of State. Due Nov 6, 2026, 5:00 PM (UTC-6).
File name: 19AQMR26Q0469 Attachment 3 PPIQ.docx
The full file is for paid members, or buy this bid alone.
Preview
87820554673500087820561912500087820567627500026130257334250006936740733425000Past Performance Information Questionnaire
Past Performance Information Questionnaire for:_[Insert Name of Offeror] Respondent: Please fill in the following table:
1.Complete Name and Title of Responder
2.Company or Agency Name, Address, Telephone Number, Facsimile Number (w/Area Code), and E-mail Address
3.Contract Name or Title, Contract Number and Type of Contract
4.Signature
4=Outstanding
Performance was substantially and consistently above contract requirements. Contractor displayed an overall superior understanding of contract requirements, and used innovative approaches leading to enhanced performance.
3=Good
Performance was above minimum contract requirements. Contractor displayed a thorough understanding of contract requirements.
2=Satisfactory
Performance met minimum contract requirements.
1=Marginal
Performance was below minimum contract requirements. Contractor displayed a lack of thorough understanding of contract requirements in one or more significant performance areas.
0=Unsatisfactory
Performance completely failed to meet the minimum contract requirements. Contractor displayed a total lack of understanding of contract requirements.
NA=Not Applicable
DK=Don’t Know
No knowledge available to respond to this question.
For any rating(s) less than 2, please attach an explanatory narrative. We greatly appreciate your time and assistance in completing this questionnaire.
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
1.How would you rate the contractor’s performance in the following areas: Meeting contract milestones? Submitting deliverables timely? Adherence to contract schedules?
[4] [3] [2] [1] [0] [NA] [DK]
[4] [3] [2] [1] [0] [NA] [DK]
[4] [3] [2] [1] [0] [NA] [DK]
2.How would you rate the contractor’s ability to perform within the contract ceiling or estimated cost?
[4] [3] [2] [1] [0] [NA] [DK]
3.Did the contractor utilize cost efficiencies in performance of your contract?
[4] [3] [2] [1] [0] [NA] [DK]
4.How would you rate the contractor’s cost performance?
[4] [3] [2] [1] [0] [NA] [DK]
5.Did the contractor submit accurate and timely invoices?
[4] [3] [2] [1] [0] [NA] [DK]
6.If proposals were generated for changes, requests for equitable adjustment, or claims, how would you rate the reasonableness of the pricing?
[4] [3] [2] [1] [0] [NA] [DK]
7How would you rate the contractor’s key personnel performance?
[4] [3] [2] [1] [0] [NA] [DK]
8How would you rate the contractor’s ability to recruit and retain strong, well-qualified key personnel?
The beginning of the document. Download the full file to read on.