Evaluation Factors - NMSO BOSS tanks

Evaluation Factors for the 2026 NMSO Boss Tank Supply Contract 1. Provide your quotation in two separate parts: PART I (Technical Proposal) PART II (Pricing Proposal) 2. Send quotation to [email protected] no later than the suspense date. Late quotes will not be considered.
3. Questions are to be submitted to [email protected] no later than the above suspense date and time. Any questions will be responded to via RFQ amendment to the vendor pool. 4. Quotes shall be valid for not less than 90 days.
5. Although the government does not currently anticipate a need for discussions, the government reserves the right to conduct discussions if necessary.

APPLICABLE EVALUATION CRITERIA

Selection of best value will be achieved through a process of evaluating each quote against the Evaluation Criteria described below.
The non-cost criteria (Technical Evaluation Factor and Past Performance) are weighted equally, and when combined are approximately less important than the price. In this case where technical capabilities are similar, price may be the deciding factor.
PRICED EVALUATION FACTOR The Government will evaluate price reasonableness for the total quoted Price. A comparative analysis will be conducted between each responsive submission. Lowest Price will be evaluated most favorably.

TECHNICAL EVALUATION FACTOR

The government will evaluate each technical submission against the requirements in the solicitations attached specifications. Contractors are responsible for providing enough technical detail to validate the requirements of the specifications. This will be evaluated on a pass or fail basis.
The offeror must demonstrate that the tanks quoted:
1. The responder shall provide the product specifications which must meet or exceed BLM solicitation specifications.
2. Acknowledge products can be delivered within the required timeframe and to the specified delivery location(s). Include lead times and expected delivery dates. PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FACTOR Government Past Performance Systems including SAM.gov and CPARS.gov will be evaluated to support the determination of responsibility required per FAR 9.104-1. Likewise, this data will be used to assess the risk confidence in the contractor. Unsatisfactory or marginal performance will be viewed as unfavorable.