Exhibit 13 ENX Past Performance Questionnaire
Updated
A PDF document (130 KB) attached to Enterprise Next (ENX) RFI, from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Due Nov 13, 2026, 3:00 PM (UTC-5).
File name: EXHIBIT 13 ENX Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf
The full file is for paid members, or buy this bid alone.
Preview
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE INSTRUCTIONS
(Updated May, 2018)
Sections 1-3 provide for contract-related descriptive information and identification of the evaluator. Section 4 lists the major work elements within our requirement. Please provide your assessment of the “relevant experience” and “performance” associated with our requirement evidenced within the contract for which you are a reference. “Experience” means a contractor who has performed work in the specific requirement element. “Did not Perform” means that the specific requirement element was not performed under the contract.
Section 5 evaluates the contractor’s technical, schedule, and cost performance and management. (Additional pages may be used for comments if desired). If you cannot answer any questions, please circle “N/R” for Not Rated.
The following definitions are offered for your use in assigning a performance rating for each of the factors in Sections 5 and 6:
Very High
(VH)
High
(H)
Moderate
(M)
Low
(L)
Very Low
(VL)
N/R
The Offeror’s relevant past performance is of exceptional merit; indicating exemplary performance in a timely, efficient, and economical manner; very minor (if any) problems with no adverse effect on overall performance.
The Offeror’s relevant past performance demonstrates very effective performance that would be fully responsive to contract requirements with contract requirements accomplished in a timely, efficient, and economical manner for the most part with only minor problems with little identifiable effect on overall performance.
The Offeror’s relevant past performance demonstrates effective performance; fully responsive to contract requirements; reportable problems, but with little identifiable effect on overall performance. The Offeror’s relevant past performance meets or slightly exceeds minimum acceptable standards; adequate results; reportable problems with identifiable, but not substantial, effects on overall performance.
The Offeror’s relevant past performance does not meet minimum acceptable standards in one or more areas; remedial action required in one or more areas; problems in one or more areas which, adversely affect overall performance.
Not Rated
Section 6 provides for evaluation of the contractor’s management of cost and award/incentive fee history.
RETURN THIS QUESTIONNAIRE TO
BY TBD
NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
Attn: Andres Castro Code 178.2
Greenbelt, MD 20771
Phone: (301) 286-0566
e-mail: [email protected]
The beginning of the document. Download the full file to read on.
Other documents in this bid
- Attachment A ENX Statement of Work
- Attachment C ENX GFP (CAP GFP List)
- Attachment F ENX Financial Management Instructions
- Attachment I ENX Contract Historical Data
- Attachment K - Non-Technical Contract-Data-Requirements-List
- Attachment K.1 DRD 1- CPIC DRD
- Attachment K.10 DRD 7 - SCV Reporting
- Attachment K.3 DRD 2- CITAR
- Attachment K.5 DRD 3- Security Requirements for Unclassified IT Resources
- Attachment K.7 DRD 4- CAIRIA
- Attachment K.8 DRD 5- LLM Transparency
- Attachment K.9 DRD 6 - OCI Plan