JA.6. - Bridge Justification and Approval Redacted
Updated
A PDF document (415 KB) attached to High Assurance Computer Systems Security, from the Department of the Navy.
File name: JA.6.302-1-21F2015 - Bridge J&A_Redacted.pdf
The full file is for paid members, or buy this bid alone.
Preview
J&A6.103-1-26-SD01
6. Description of Efforts M a de to Solicit Offerors from as Many Offerors as Practicable No effort was made to pursue other potential sources due to the unacceptable delays and disruption in critical program and projects. However, in accordance with FAR 5.201, a pre-solicitation notice was posted on SAM.gov on 24 August 2026. Three responses were received. Two responses included proposals that were formally evaluated by the Contracting Officer’s Representative and determined not technically capable. The third response was a general company introduction that included a statement of interest in future full and open requirements for Code 5500. 7. Determination of Fair and Reasonable Cost.
In accordance with FAR 15.404-1(b)(5), the Government will use the Independent Government Cost Estimate (IGCE) in combination with FAR 15.404-1(b)(2), comparison of proposed prices to historical prices paid, to determine whether the proposed cost/price is fair and reasonable. In accordance with FAR 15.403-3, certified cost or pricing data will be required in support of the proposed costs. 8. Actions to Remove Barriers to Future Competition.
A new competitive award is currently in progress, and award is expected to be made during the performance period of the bridge contract. This bridge action is a temporary measure to prevent a break in critical IT and research and development support to NRL during the time required to award a competitive follow-on contract. Moving forward, the Government will seek to begin pre-award work for recompete contracts sooner in order accommodate for any protest-related delays.
J&A6.103-1-26-SD01
CERTIFICATIONS AND APPROVAL
TECHNICAL/REQUIREMENTS CERTIFICATION
I certify that the facts and representations under my cognizance, which are included in this Justification, except as noted herein, are complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge and belief.
9/16/26
Date
LEGAL SUFFICIENCY REVIEW:
I have determined that this Justification is legally sufficient.
9/17/26
Date
CONTRACTING OFFICER CERTIFICATION:
I certify that this Justification is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief.
9/17/26
Date
COMPETITION ADVOCATE APPROVAL
9/23/26
Date
The beginning of the document. Download the full file to read on.