L-2 Past Perf Questionnaire Past Performance Questionnaire

SECTION L – VOLUME 2

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Within 2 weeks from receipt of this questionnaire, return this form to Contract Specialist (CS) at [email protected] with a CC to Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO) Chris Bigelow at [email protected].

1. CONTRACTOR IDENTIFICATION

a. Contractor:
b. Program Title:
c. Contract Number:
d. Type of Contract: Percent Complete:

Note: Whether identified or not, if you have any knowledge of other contracts for the identified contractor, you are requested to complete a questionnaire for each contract or subcontract similar to this acquisition.

2. RESPONDENT IDENTIFICATION

a. Name:
b. Agency:
c. Position:
d. Relation to Program:
e. Phone:
f. Fax Number:
g. Email Address:
f. Date Questionnaire Completed:

3. PROGRAM CHARACTERISTICS

3a. Please provide a short description of the subject contract.

3b. Please check those activities, which are applicable to your program

FORMCHECKBOX Design & Engineering Review & Support
FORMCHECKBOX Field Engineering & Analyses
FORMCHECKBOX Installation Support
FORMCHECKBOX Program & Project Management
FORMCHECKBOX Logistics & Asset Tracking
FORMCHECKBOX Repair Coordination & Tracking
FORMCHECKBOX Electronic Documentation Library
FORMCHECKBOX Procurement & Subcontract Management
FORMCHECKBOX CRIIS Experience

4. PERFORMANCE LEVELS

4.1 PERFORMANCE GRADES (Use these grades to provide the overall rating where requested below).

Exceptional - Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Very Good - Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Satisfactory - Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Marginal - Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.