Pre Sol AST UST

This is not a request for either a quote or proposal, or an invitation for bid. The intent of this presolicitation synopsis is to notify potentials of a Facility Support, Firm Fixed Price (FFP)/Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ), Performance-Based contract with recurring and non-recurring services to perform Maintenance and Repairs of Aboveground Storage Tanks (AST) and Underground Storage Tanks (UST) at the Naval Station Newport Naval Undersea Warfare Center, Newport Rhode Island.
General Work Requirements: Annex 1502000 - Facility Investment The contractor shall provide labor, management, supervision, tools, material and equipment, required to perform:
Maintenance and Repair of Above Ground Storage Tanks (AST), Underground Storage Tanks (UST), leak detection systems, Emergency, Urgent and Routine (E/U/R) Work, Integrated Maintenance Program (IMP), AST/UST Inspection and Maintenance Program, and Hazardous Waste (HW) Disposal as described in the Performance Work Statement (PWS). The work identified is to be provided by means of a Facility Support, Firm Fixed Price (FFP)/Indefinite Delivery, Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract with recurring and non-recurring services. Source Selection procedures will be used to select the proposal that provides the best Offeror using the Tradeoff analysis in accordance with FAR Part 15 – Source Selection Process. The solicitation and resulting contract award will be a performance-based service acquisition made to the responsible offeror whose proposal, conforming to the Request for Proposals (RFP), will be advantageous to the Government price and other evaluation factors considered. The Offeror’s proposal shall contain a response to each of the evaluation factors and shall be in the form prescribed by the solicitation. The solicitation requires the evaluation of price and the following non-price factors:
Factor 1 – Technical/ Approach Management
Factor 2 – Corporate Experience
Factor 3 – Safety
Factor 4 – Past Performance.
NOTE: The relative order of importance of the non-cost/price evaluation factors is; the technical factors (Factors 1, 2, and 3) are of equal importance to each other and, when combined, are equal in importance to the past performance evaluation/performance confidence assessment (Factor 4). When the proposal is evaluated as a whole, the technical factors and past performance/performance confidence assessment factor combined (i.e., the non-cost/price evaluation factors) are approximately equal to price.