TACTICAL Broad Agency Announcement Executive Summary Review Form

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

AIR FORCE RESEARCH LABORATORY

Tactical BAA Topic Area Groups (TAGs) Executive Summary Review

BACKGROUND

The following Executive Summary (ES) was received under the FA9451-24-S-0001 TACTICAL BAA and reviewed to determine selection inclusion as a group member under the identified Topic Area: Topic Area
Title of Executive Summary
Offeror

CAGE/UEI

Offeror Technical POC and Contacts
Offeror Contracting POC and Contacts
Date Received
Date Review Completed

REVIEW

The Executive Summary was reviewed for the following technical factors in accordance with FAR 35.007(a) by a minimum two (2) technical personnel with concurrence from a Division Chief, Deputy Division Chief, or Chief Engineer. A Contracting Officer also approved the final assessment. The ES was reviewed for the following eight (8) Factors, with one (1) selection per factor. Each factor has four (4) options with points attributed to them: “Well Qualified” (3 points), “Qualified” (2 points), “Minimally Qualified” (1 points), and “Not Qualified” (0 points). To gain access to the Topic Area Group (TAG), the ES must score a minimum of eighteen (18) out of a maximum of twenty-four (24) points. Any ‘Not Qualified’ rating results in an automatic disqualification of the ES as not technically qualified. Note: offerors can meet these criteria either on their own or through established partnerships as long as they are clearly identified within the Executive Summary.
Review Factors
1.

2.

The Executive Summary is aligned with topic area
Well Qualified
Executive Summary demonstrates technical qualifications in three (3) or more sub-topic categories within the topic area. Qualified
Executive Summary demonstrates technical qualifications in two (2) sub-topic categories within the topic area.
Minimally Qualified
Executive Summary demonstrates technical qualifications in one sub-topic category within the topic area.
Not selectable
Does not align with topic area or within any of the sub-topic categories
Demonstrates that the offeror possesses experience in performing work of this nature within the topic area
Well Qualified
Clearly demonstrates highly relevant present and/or past similar work in three (3) or more sub-topic categories and provides specific contract numbers/project titles, Independent Research and Development (IRAD) investments, etc. to substantiate experience.

Deliver and Support Agile War-Winning Capabilities

Points

Qualified

4.

Demonstrates present and/or past relevant work in two (2) subtopic areas, provides specific contract numbers/project titles,