A. Twin Falls RLP - Amendment 3
Updated
A PDF document (233 KB) attached to VHA seeking 20,250 RSF for a Community Based Outreach Clinic in Twin Falls, ID, from the Department of Veterans Affairs. Due Nov 10, 2026, 4:00 PM (UTC-8).
File name: 00 A. Twin Falls RLP - Amendment No. 3.pdf
The full file is for paid members, or buy this bid alone.
Preview
AMENDMENT NO. 3
REQUEST FOR LEASE PROPOSAL NO.
36C24W26R0017
November 04, 2026
Veterans Affairs (VA)
Twin Falls, ID
Community Based Outpatient Clinic (CBOC)
RLP Clarifications/Questions:
1. Order of Precedence Among RLP Exhibits
Question: Where the Agency Requirements, the Program for Design (PFD), the Lease Design Narrative (LDN), and other exhibits contain differing information, which document controls?
Response: Exhibit 02, Agency Requirements (Agency Specific Requirements), controls. Where information in Exhibit 02 differs from Exhibit 02a (Program for Design), Exhibit 02a1 (Project Room Contents List), Exhibit 02a2 (Lease Design Narrative), Exhibit 02a3 (Room Data Matrix), Exhibit 02a4 (IT Systems Specifications), Exhibit 02b (Janitorial Services), or the Draft Lease, Exhibit 02 governs. The appendices are provided as examples and reference material for the Offeror’s design team, reflecting typical PACTmodel clinic layouts and standards. They are not the Government’s definitive program for this clinic.
2. Space Program: Agency Requirements vs. Program for Design Question: Exhibit 02, 1.0.2 states quantities in both words and numerals that do not agree (e.g., “three (21) PACT Primary Care exam rooms,” “One (3) PACT Patient Toilet”) and Exhibits 02 and 02a list different room types and quantities (e.g., 21 exam rooms vs. 10; Foot Care, Dermatology/Bariatric, and Lactation rooms do not appear in the PFD). Does the PFD take precedence, and will the Agency Requirements be updated to match the PFD?
Response: The PFD does not take precedence over the Agency Requirements, and the Government does not intend to revise Exhibit 02 to match Exhibit 02a. Exhibit 02 is the best statement of the Government’s intent for this clinic, which is a medium-sized outpatient clinic (see RLP 1.02(A)). Exhibit 02a is provided as an example of a typical PACT-model layout.
3. Cultural Resources Study Report
Question: Is a signed commitment to have the Cultural Resources Study performed sufficient at RLP submittal, given that these studies can take time? Response: RLP 2.12 is modified as follows. In lieu of submitting the completed Cultural Resources Study Report with the initial offer, an Offeror proposing a site that involves new construction, build-to-suit, demolition, or other significant ground-disturbing work shall submit with its initial offer: (a) a written commitment of services from a qualified firm or professional to perform the Cultural Resources Study described in RLP 2.12(A)–(D);
The beginning of the document. Download the full file to read on.
Other documents in this bid
- TWIN FALLS Global Request for Lease Proposal
- Exhibit 01. Draft Lease No
- Exhibit 02. Agency Requirements
- Exhibit 02a. Program for Design PFD
- Exhibit 02a1. Project Room Contents List-PRCL
- Exhibit 02a2. Appendix A2 - Lease Design Narrative LDN
- Exhibit 02a4. VA CBOC IT Systems Specifications v05.23
- Exhibit 02b. Janitorial Services
- Exhibit 03. Security Requirements - Facility Security Level II
- Exhibit 04. 3516 Solicitation Provisions Feb. 2025
- Exhibit 05. 3517B General Clauses (Apr. 2026)
- Exhibit 08. Prelease FPLS Evaluation Form 12000 Part A and Part B