Addendum Evaluation
Updated
A PDF document (189 KB) attached to Solicitation - Sword Belt, buckles, & Frog United States Military Academy West Point, NY, from the Department of the Army. Due Nov 30, 2026, 12:00 PM (UTC-5).
File name: 52.212-2 Addendum Evaluation.pdf
The full file is for paid members, or buy this bid alone.
Preview
52.212-2 Addendum
Evaluation – COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS AND COMMERCIAL SERVICES (Nov 2021)
(a) The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:
Evaluations will be based on specifications provided by requiring activity and supporting documents provided by industry.
Interested parties shall submit product samples in order to be considered for award by the closing date of November 30, 2026 no later than 12 PM Eastern Time. (b) Evaluation Criteria. Product samples. One (1) Sword belt size large, (1) sword belt size small, (1) frog with their quote required at or prior to the time specified for receipt of offers (see 52.212-1 Addendum). These samples shall be submitted at no expense to the Government. Samples will be evaluated in accordance with the evaluation criteria listed below. Evaluation criteria consists of factors. The quote will be evaluated under TWO (2) evaluation factors: Sample and Price.
Quotes will be evaluated on a pass/fail basis regarding technical requirements. To be eligible for award, a proposal must receive a rating of "Acceptable" in all non-price evaluation Factors. Any proposal receiving an "Unacceptable" rating in one or more nonprice Factors will be excluded from award consideration. All products shall be examined for conformance to the dimensions in Section 4, Belt, Buckle & Frog Evaluation Criteria in the Specifications Manual document. All products should adhere to the specifications in the contract or purchase order. Factor 1 – Sample. The Sample will receive a rating defined below.
TECHNICAL ACCEPTABLE/UNACCEPTABLE RATINGS
Rating
Definition
Acceptable
Quote meets the requirements of the solicitation
Unacceptable Quote does not meet the requirements of the solicitation
Factor 2 – Price. Price will be scored or rated. Evaluation of price will be performed using one or more of the price analysis techniques in FAR 13.106-3(a). Through these techniques the Government will determine whether prices are reasonable. Samples will be evaluated in accordance with the specifications attached in this solicitation.
The beginning of the document. Download the full file to read on.