Appendix A - ARPA-H Solutions Summary Template-Amend-3

Appendix A: Mission Office Solution Summary Template
Solution Summary Cover Page

<PRIME ORGANIZATION LOGO (optional)>

Innovative Solutions Opening Title

Solution Summary Title

Submitter Organization

Type of Organization
Choose all that apply:
☐ For-Profit
☐ Non-profit
☐ Academia
Technical Point of Contact (POC)
Name:
Mailing Address:
Telephone:
Email:
Administrative POC
Name:
Mailing Address:
Telephone:
Email:
Estimated Project Duration
Total Basis of Estimate
Resource Sharing (if applicable)
Place(s) of Performance

SUB-AWARDEE AND CONSULTANT

TEAM MEMBERS

(Add rows as necessary)

Organization Name:

Technical POC Name:

Organization Type(s):
Choose all that apply:
☐ For-Profit
☐ Non-profit
☐ Academia
Organization Name:

Technical POC Name:

Organization Type(s):
Choose all that apply:
☐ For-Profit
☐ Non-profit
☐ Academia
Organization Name:

Technical POC Name:

Organization Type(s):
Choose all that apply:
☐ For-Profit
☐ Non-profit
☐ Academia
Organization Name:

Technical POC Name:

Organization Type(s):
Choose all that apply:
☐ For-Profit
☐ Non-profit
☐ Academia

NOTE: All Solution Summary submissions must be submitted in English with sans serif font type NO smaller than 11-point and with a readability similar to that of Calibri, Arial, or Avenir Next Pro Light. Smaller sans serif fonts may be used for figures, tables, and charts. Solution Summaries have a limit of six (6) pages. Citations do not count toward the six-page limit. Content recommendations are displayed in blue font and should be deleted before submitting the Solution Summary.

Concept Summary
Describe the solution summary concept with minimal jargon and explain how it addresses the ISO interest areas.

Innovation and Impact
Clearly identify the outcome(s) sought and/or the problem(s) to be solved with the proposed technology concept. Describe how the proposed effort represents an innovative and potentially revolutionary solution to the ISO interest areas. Explain the concept’s potential to be disruptive compared to existing or emerging technologies and how the proposed approach will go far beyond current existing capabilities. To the extent possible, provide quantitative metrics in a table that compares the proposed technology concept to current and emerging technologies which may include: A progression of increasingly complex technical challenges. State of the art / emerging technology “baseline.”
Aggressive metrics for each year of the proposed project.