Attachment 14: Ordering Procedures

MJU-76 ORDERING PROCEDURES UNDER MULTIPLE AWARD CONTRACT

1) One or more delivery orders (DOs) may be issued during the life of this contract. In accordance with RFO 16.507-2, Fair Opportunity Procedures, the CO will provide all awardees a "fair opportunity" to be considered for each order in excess of $15,000 unless one of the conditions below applies: A. The agency need for the supplies or services is so urgent that providing a fair opportunity would result in unacceptable delays.
B. Only one awardee is capable of providing the supplies or services required at the level of quality required because the supplies or services ordered are unique or highly specialized. C. The order must be issued on a sole-source basis in the interest of economy and efficiency because it is a logical follow-on to an order already issued under the contract, provided that all awardees were given a fair opportunity to be considered for the original order.
D. It is necessary to place an order to satisfy a minimum guarantee. E. For orders exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, a statute expressly authorizes or requires that the purchase be made from a specified source.
Any contractor delay in production greater than 45 days may require a new First Article at the contractor’s expense. This will not apply to excusable delays per RFO 52.249-14. 2) The award of future, after DO1, MJU-76 delivery orders for production will follow the ordering procedures listed below:
A) The Government will evaluate price and past performance through a tradeoff methodology. Past performance will be evaluated solely for performance under the MJU-76B IDIQ. The government may limit the quantity of flares, percent split/award, for an offeror that has a Marginal or Unsatisfactory CPARS rating for any evaluation factor within the last 12 months for the base MJU-76/B IDIQ; this limitation is at the sole discretion of the Government. CPARS evaluation factors include: Technical, Schedule, Management, and Small Business Subcontracting. A Marginal rating may result in a reduction of offeror’s split award to 30% of the buy to budget dollars. An Unsatisfactory rating may result in a reduction of offeror’s split award to 0%, no resulting award. B) Each awardee will be provided a pricing table with a request for order proposal. The pricing table will require each awardee to propose pricing for order items; e.g. unit pricing on given quantity ranges for USG and FMS Production Units (CLINs 0004, 0005, & 0006), lot pricing for First Article/MSE Testing (CLIN 0003), and/or MSE