Attachment 2: Past Performance Questionnaire

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Naval Supply Systems Command (NAVSUP) Fleet Logistics Center (FLC) Sigonella is currently evaluating competitive offers for Engineering Support Services. The Contractor will provide the Forward Deployed Regional Maintenance Center (FDRMC) with engineering services in support of FDRMC and various ships in the FDRMC area of responsibility (AOR) as follows:

Engineering Technicians (for example, but not limited to Mechanical Auxiliary, Mechanical Hydraulics, Marine Gas Turbine Inspector, Combat Systems-CANES/Afloat Network, Combat Systems-SPY, and METCAL Program) Depot and Intermediate Maintenance Support/Production Controllers (for example, but not limited to D Level Planner, IMA Planner, and Dive Planner, Fleet Technical Assistance Integrator, Planner) You have been named as a point of contact for services previously provided by the contractor cited herein. Please provide the information requested in the questionnaire. The information you provide will become part of the source selection documentation, however your name will not be released to any of the parties. Should you have any questions concerning this request, please contact Mr. Ricardo Lopez in Naples, Italy at [email protected] and Dave Biggs at [email protected].

========================================================================= (To be completed by person to whom questionnaire is addressed):

1.Background Information

a.Name of person completing this questionnaire and position.

2.Contractor's Past Performance

In your opinion, is the work performed under your contract is similar in scope, size and complexity as the work described below:

Please circle one of the four levels of relevancy:

RATING

VR R SR NR

Scope

VR R SR NR

Magnitude

VR R SR NR

Complexity

VR= Very Relevant
R = Relevant
SR= Somewhat Relevant
NR= Not Relevant

Scope: Range of operations covered
Magnitude: Dollar value
Complexity: Degree of difficulty

The definitions for relevancy ratings are as follows:

Very Relevant: Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope, magnitude of efforts, and complexities this solicitation requires.

Relevant: Present/past performance effort involved similar scope, magnitude of efforts, and complexities this solicitation requires.

Somewhat Relevant: Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope, magnitude of efforts, and complexities this solicitation requires.

Not Relevant: Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope,