Attachment 4: Section M
Updated
A PDF document (165 KB) attached to 711th HPW Mission Support Services MAC IDIQ, from the Department of the Air Force. Due Oct 30, 2026, 3:00 PM (UTC-4).
File name: Attachment 4 - Section M.pdf
The full file is for paid members, or buy this bid alone.
Preview
Attachment 4
SECTION M: EVALUATION CRITERIA
FA2396-26-R-B008
SECTION M — EVALUATION CRITERIA
1.0 Section M Evaluation Criteria
1.1 SOURCE SELECTION
The evaluation criteria establishes how the Government will make its selection for award, the number of awards contemplated, and how the various considerations and criteria interrelate. The results of the evaluation will be considered by the Government to determine which proposal(s) represents the best value to the Government.
2.0 General Provisions
2.1 General
The Government intends to competitively award, multiple Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contracts, utilizing the process of evaluation and the evaluation criteria described herein. This source selection will be conducted in accordance with Revolutionary Federal Acquisition Regulation Overhaul (RFO) Part 15, as supplemented by the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (R-DFARS), Department of War (DoW) Source Selection Procedures. These regulations are available electronically at RFO Site, https://www.acquisition.gov/.
2.1.1 Cost or Price Evaluation Exclusion
Notwithstanding the above, in accordance with 10 U.S.C. § 3303(a)(1)(B) (formerly 10 U.S.C. § 2305(a)(3)(C)), as amended by Section 825 of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year 2017, the Government will not evaluate cost or price for the IDIQ contract.
2.1.2 Responsibility and Conformity
Contract award will only be made to the Offerors who are deemed responsible in accordance with the RFO Part 9, as supplemented, whose proposals conform to the solicitation’s requirements (to include all stated terms, conditions, representations, and certifications) and are judged, based on the evaluation factors, to represent the best value to the Government. While the Government will strive for maximum objectivity, the source selection process, by its nature, is subjective; and therefore, professional judgment is implicit throughout the entire process.
2.1.3 Technical Threshold and Self-Scoring
Contract award(s) will be made to all qualifying offerors whose proposals meet the established technical threshold. The Government will not rank-order proposals, and awards will be made to all responsible sources whose proposals are evaluated as technically acceptable (receiving the minimum qualifying
Section M Attachment 4 • Evaluation Criteria
FA2396-25-R-B003 • Page 1 of 6
Attachment 4
SECTION M: EVALUATION CRITERIA
FA2396-26-R-B008
score) for all evaluation factors. The evaluation will use a self-scoring system validated by the
The beginning of the document. Download the full file to read on.
Other documents in this bid
- Attachment 1: Performance Work Statement
- Attachment 3: Section L
- Solicitation
- Attachment 12: ODC Burden Rate Matrix - Amendment 1
- Attachment 3: Section L - Amendment 1
- Attachment 4: Section M - Amendment 1
- Attachment 3: Section L - Amendment 2
- Attachment 4: Section M - Amendment 4
- QA for posting -Amendment 4
- Solicitation Amendment - Conformed
- Amendment 6: QAs
- Attachment 1: Performance Work Statement - Amendment 6