Exhibit 11. PastPerf Questionnaire

RLP 36C24W26R0017

Exhibit No. 11

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

SECTION A: Contractor Information (to be completed by the contractor for whom past performance information is being collected, prior to forwarding to assessors) Solicitation Number
Project/Requirement
Customer/Agency

36C24W26R0017
VA/CBOC - Twin Falls, ID
CFM - RPO West Leasing / VA

Name and Address:
5. Description of Services provided under contract:

ASSESSOR INFORMATION:

Assessor Name

Title
Phone Number/Email
Address
8. Authorization is hereby granted to provide the information requested in this questionnaire to RPO West Leasing, Christina Wolf, Lease Contracting Officer, via email at [email protected].

(Signature)

(Name and Title of Authorizing Official)

(Date)

RLP 36C24W26R0017

Exhibit No. 11

SECTION B: Assessors Information (to be completed by assessors). RATING SCALE Definitions
E
S

M

U

N

Past Performance Ratings and Definitions
Offer’s past performance record provides
Exceptional/Very Low Risk
essentially no doubt that the offeror will
successfully perform the required effort.
Offer’s past performance record provides little
Satisfactory/Low Risk
doubt that the offeror will successfully perform
the required effort.
Offer’s past performance record, although
satisfactory, provides some doubt that the
Marginal/Moderate Risk
offeror will successfully perform the required
effort.
Offer’s past performance record provides
Unsatisfactory/High Risk
substantial doubt that the offeror will
successfully perform the required effort.
The offeror has no relevant past performance
record. A thorough search was unable to
Neutral/Unknown Risk
identify any past performance. Will not rate
favorably or unfavorably.

The questions on the survey (see below) shall be rated in accordance with the definitions provided in the Rating Scale. Any unsatisfactory or marginal rating shall be supplemented with an explanation in the space provided.

QUALITY OF SERVICE

1. Rate the contractor’s compliance with contractual requirements.

(E /S /M /U /N)

2. Overall rating of contractor quality of service.

(E /S /M /U /N)

1. Delivery of service was within required time period specified by contract requirements.

(E /S /M /U /N)

2. Rate the contractor’s ability to control cost and submit invoices. Are invoices complete, accurate, and timely?

(E /S /M /U /N)

PLEASE PROVIDE RATIONALE FOR ASSIGNED RATING:

SCHEDULE

PLEASE PROVIDE RATIONALE FOR ASSIGNED RATING:

RLP 36C24W26R0017