Questions and Answers - Amendment 1
Updated
A PDF document (75 KB) attached to Repair of Electrovalve for Use on MH-65, from the US Coast Guard. Due Nov 12, 2026, 10:00 AM (UTC-5).
File name: Questions and Answers - Amendment 1.pdf
The full file is for paid members, or buy this bid alone.
Preview
Question 1: Please confirm the correct component, NSN, and part number applicable to this solicitation?
Answer: The Statement of Work and Requirements Spreadsheets have been corrected.
Question 2: Please confirm whether the base quantity is one (1) unit, as stated in SOW Section 1, or three (3) units, as stated in the Requirements spreadsheet, and amend the applicable document accordingly?
Answer: The Statement of Work and Requirements Spreadsheets have been corrected. We are Requesting Three (3) units, with a requested option of Ten (10) additional units within one (1) year.
Question 3: Please confirm the correct optional quantity and maximum total quantity, reconciling the SOW's 15 optional units with the Requirements spreadsheet and FAR 52.217-6, which identify 10 optional units and a maximum total quantity of 13? Answer: The Statement of Work and Requirements Spreadsheets have been corrected. We are Requesting Three (3) units, with a requested option of Ten (10) additional units within one (1) year.
Question 4: Please confirm the correct CLIN structure and clarify whether the same Test and Evaluation fee applies to both RFI and BER components, including where each fee should be entered for pricing and evaluation purposes?
Answer: Per the Statement of work (SOW) these items are Tracked, meaning that each item will have its own CLIN. Per section 2 of the SOW the contractor will perform a test and evaluation to determine the condition of the item. Therefore, the Test and Evaluation fee is included in the repair cost, as indicated in the notes of the requirements sheet. This is also the fee for BER items. Per the SOW:
2. Test and Evaluation. Upon receipt of the components, the contractor shall perform a test and evaluation to determine the condition of the item. If, after visual and functional inspections, an item is found to meet manufacturer's minimum performance specifications and is considered to be Ready for Installation (RFI) or is considered to be Beyond Economical Repair (BER) in accordance with (IAW) paragraph 11, the contractor will be allowed the firm fixed price for test and evaluation only. The contractor shall prepare a failure data report IAW paragraph 13
which shall be included with the returned component. The parts shall be marked "RFI” or “BER” IAW paragraph 11, and returned as-is. All other items shall be repaired IAW this SOW.
Question 5: Does an FAA or EASA Part 145 certification, OEM qualification, or USCG SRR Engineering approval satisfy the USCG-approved repair facility requirement in SOW
The beginning of the document. Download the full file to read on.