Attachment 12: CPARS-Oversight and Metrics

ATTACHMENT 12 - CPARSOVERSIGHT AND METRICS

N3220526R6006
In successfully providing these services to the Fleet, there are two basic performance requirements for MSC’s vessels: 1) keep the vessel in a readiness state that allows it to perform any mission assigned to it by the Fleet Commander, and 2) perform assigned missions. Accordingly, in measuring the extent to which a contractor meets the PWS, MSC monitors and measures both the condition/readiness of the vessel, and the performance of specific missions/tasks. Accordingly, in measuring the extent to which a contractor meets the Performance Work Statement (PWS), MSC monitors and measures both the condition/readiness of the vessel, and the performance of specific missions/tasks. MSC will routinely conduct Onboard Condition Inspections (OCI) (normally conducted annually) to monitor performance elements through ship visits and site audits as outlined in the PWS. On an annual basis, the contractor’s performance will be evaluated for its Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) rating. This evaluation will use, primarily, the metrics below. The results of these metrics will be communicated to the contractor as part of contract administration and any discrepancies or issues will be addressed using the contract remedies available. Requirements

Metric

Cost: The metric will be used to manage reimbursable expenses within established ship operating budgets.

Differences between expected/budgeted and
actual costs.

The RFT metric is a cumulative total of calendar
Schedule/Performance: This metric will be used to determine MSC days that a ship is deemed RFT or Not ready for
primary output of Ships Ready for Tasking (RFT), the key indicator Tasking (NRFT) in the preceding rolling 12of MSC readiness. COMSC is responsible to deliver MSC ships RFT month period compared to an accepted baseline
and to maintain this readiness during operational fleet time. established by MSC.

Inspection: This metric will track planned maintenance against performed maintenance, supplemented by periodic inspections of actual vessel condition.

The difference between the Shipboard
Automated Maintenance Module (SAMM)
System scheduled planned maintenance and
actual completion rates for ships. The MSC
Program Manager will track findings of annual
vessel condition inspections to identify degraded
or poor vessel condition and the operating
contractor’s corrective action.

Manning & Training: This metric will be used to ensure fully