Attachment 20: Evaluation Factors (Section M)

Section M - Evaluation Factors for Award
Section M - Evaluation Factors for Award
Basis of contract award will be a competitive best value source selection in which competing offerors past performance history will be considered significantly more important than price considerations. The contract will be a Firm-Fixed-Price contract. The procurement consists of one solicitation with the intent to award a target of two (2) IDIQ Construction Contracts to the responsible offerors whose proposals, conforming to the Request for Proposal (RFP), will be most advantageous to the Government resulting in the best value, price and past performance factors considered. The Government also intends to evaluate up to three Offerors for inclusion in an on-ramp pool. The Government reserves the right to evaluate and/or award more than or fewer than the target number of contracts.

FACTOR I - PRICE EVALUATION

Initially, offers shall be ranked according to total proposed price for the TOTAL BID (Sum of all CLINs). An offeror’s proposed prices will be determined by multiplying the quantities identified in Schedule B, Price Schedule, by the proposed unit price for each Line Item to confirm the extended amount for each. The extended amounts will be added together to determine the total evaluated price (The total evaluated price will not be used as the award amount, only for price evaluation purposes. Task order award amounts will be the result of fair opportunity competition amount the FEM contractors, utilizing the competitively established pricing from the Schedule B*).
Sample Project Evaluation:
Offerors are required to submit a detailed price proposal for one (1) sample project. The sample project price proposal will be evaluated to demonstrate the offeror's comprehensive understanding of contract pricing requirements and pricing methodology. The sample project price will not be factored into the offeror’s total evaluated price.
Offerors whose total evaluated price or sample project price is unreasonable (in accordance with RFO 15.404 and RFO 31.201-3), unbalanced (in accordance with RFO 15.404-1), or unaffordable (not within any budgetary information included in the solicitation) may not be considered for award. The price evaluation will document the reasonableness and affordability of the proposed total evaluated price and the sample project.
*Note: Proposed unit prices are not-to-exceed prices. Should an offeror be awarded this contract, subsequent task orders must utilize the proposed unit prices or lower in the task order pricing.