Enclosure 1 Past Performance Questionnaire
Updated
A PDF document (155 KB) attached to NASA Postdoctoral Program-3 (NPP-3) - Draft Request for Proposal (DRFP), from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Due Oct 30, 2026, 3:00 PM (UTC-4).
File name: 80HQTR27R0006_NPP-3 Enclosure 1_PPQ.pdf
The full file is for paid members, or buy this bid alone.
Preview
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE INSTRUCTIONS
(Updated May, 2018)
Sections 1-3 provide for contract-related descriptive information and identification of the evaluator. Section 4 lists the major work elements within our Statement of Work (SOW). Please provide your assessment of the “relevant experience” and “performance” associated with our SOW evidenced within the contract for which you are a reference. “Experience” means a contractor who has performed work in the specific SOW Element. “Did not Perform” means that the specific SOW element was not performed under the contract. Section 5 evaluates the contractor’s technical, schedule, and cost performance and management. (Additional pages may be used for comments if desired). If you cannot answer any questions, please circle “N/R” for Not Rated.
The following definitions are offered for your use in assigning a performance rating for each of the factors in Sections 5 and 6:
Very High
(VH)
High
(H)
Moderate
(M)
Low
(L)
Very Low
(VL)
N/R
The Offeror’s relevant past performance is of exceptional merit; indicating exemplary performance in a timely, efficient, and economical manner; very minor (if any) problems with no adverse effect on overall performance.
The Offeror’s relevant past performance demonstrates very effective performance that would be fully responsive to contract requirements with contract requirements accomplished in a timely, efficient, and economical manner for the most part with only minor problems with little identifiable effect on overall performance.
The Offeror’s relevant past performance demonstrates effective performance; fully responsive to contract requirements; reportable problems, but with little identifiable effect on overall performance. The Offeror’s relevant past performance meets or slightly exceeds minimum acceptable standards; adequate results; reportable problems with identifiable, but not substantial, effects on overall performance.
The Offeror’s relevant past performance does not meet minimum acceptable standards in one or more areas; remedial action required in one or more areas; problems in one or more areas which, adversely affect overall performance.
Not Rated
Section 6 provides for evaluation of the contractor’s management of cost and award/incentive fee history.
RETURN THIS QUESTIONNAIRE TO
BY TBD.
NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
Attn: Leona Ellis, Code 173.
Greenbelt, MD 20771
e-mail: [email protected]
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
The beginning of the document. Download the full file to read on.
Other documents in this bid
- Attachment B-1 Payment Table for Fixed Price Services
- Attachment B Financial Management Reporting
- Attachment E-1 Security Requirements for Unclassified IT Resources DRD
- Attachment E-2 DRD CSIRIA
- Attachment E-3 DRD CITAR
- Attachment E-4 DRD CPIC
- Attachment E Contract Data Requirements List
- DRFP Cover Letter
- Enclosure 2 Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan
- Enclosure 3 CITAR Report Template
- SF33 and TCs
- E-Library -Science-Plan