ATCH 06 Evaluation Factors
Updated
A PDF document (96 KB) attached to PACA Special Audits RFQ, from the Department of the Air Force. Due Dec 23, 2026, 4:00 PM (UTC-6).
File name: ATCH 06 Evaluation_Factors (3NOV26).pdf
The full file is for paid members, or buy this bid alone.
Preview
ATTACHMENT 06 – EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD (SPECIAL
AUDITS)
Public Accountant Contract Audit Program (PACA) - Special Audits
03 November 2026
1.0 BASIS FOR MASTER CONTRACT AWARD
The NAFI intends to award up to three (3) Nonappropriated Fund Purchasing Agreements (NPAs) from this solicitation to the responsible offerors whose quotes, conforming to the RFQ, are determined to be the Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA). Initial master agreement placement will be based on meeting all technical requirements and having the lowest total evaluated prices. All technically acceptable offers will be evaluated on a Pass/Fail basis.
2.0 DELIVERY ORDER ROTATION AND BEST VALUE PLACEMENT
Following the placement of the up to three (3) master NPAs, the NAFI reserves the unilateral right to award individual financial and performance audits to any of the successful prime contractors based on the best value and overall benefit to the NAFI. The NAFI is not obligated to assign audits to a specific contractor and may rotate or distribute tasking based on factors including: contractor resource availability, specialized program familiarity, geographical alignment, performance history, and optimal pricing for that specific task.
3.0 TECHNICAL ACCEPTABILITY CRITERIA
To achieve a rating of 'Acceptable' under the Technical factor, the offeror's proposal must satisfy all requirements of the Statement of Objectives (SOO) and Instructions to Contractors (ATCH 01), specifically: - Complete CSOW: Narrative demonstrating a comprehensive approach to performing the specialized audits without ambiguous responses.
- Subcontracting Prohibition: Strict compliance with the subcontractor ban. Proposals featuring subcontractor labor, joint ventures, or 1099 consultants will receive an automatic rating of 'Unacceptable'. - Overseas Travel Declaration: Offerors must explicitly state in their technical response if they are willing to travel overseas to the locations listed in Attachment 12, or if they wish to restrict performance to CONUSonly . A CONUS-only restriction will not disqualify the bidder from the master NPA placement but will govern task-order routing.
Rating
Description
ACCEPTABLE
Quote clearly meets all master technical requirements.
UNACCEPTABLE
Quote fails to meet the technical requirements or attempts to utilize subcontracted labor.
4.0 PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Past Performance will be assessed as Acceptable or Unacceptable based on recent and relevant experience. Any
The beginning of the document. Download the full file to read on.
Other documents in this bid
- ATCH 01 Instructions to Contractors Special Audits
- ATCH 03 Special Provisions
- ATCH 04 - Statement of Objectives
- ATCH 05 - Supplies Services and Prices
- ATCH 07 Deliveries or Performances
- ATCH 08 - Contract Administration Data
- ATCH 09 Reps and Certs
- ATCH 10 Contractor Past Performance Information
- ATCH 11 NPA Agreement Sample
- ATCH 12 List of Potential Audit Locations
- ATCH 13 Historical Workload
- Offeror Letter - PACA Special Audits