Home / TOTAL ENGINEERING AND INTEGRATION SERVICES (TEIS) IV… / Document

Attachment 21: item c TEIS IV - D254 - Contract AT-OPSEC Security Review Cover Sheet

Updated

A PDF document (488 KB) attached to TOTAL ENGINEERING AND INTEGRATION SERVICES (TEIS) IV On-Ramp Opportunity, from the Department of the Army. Due Oct 30, 2026, 4:00 PM (UTC-6).

File name: ATT0021 item c TEIS IV - D254 - Contract AT-OPSEC Security Review Cover Sheet.pdf

Download the full documentSee the bid

The full file is for paid members, or buy this bid alone.

Preview

CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS PACKAGE ANTITERRORISM/

OPERATIONS SECURITY REVIEW COVER SHEET

Requirements Package Title:

POC:

TEIS IV On-Ramp W91RUS27RA006

Christopher Chavez

Date:

7/21/2026

Section I.
Purpose of cover sheet: To document the review of the requirements package statement of work statement (SOW) quality assurance surveillance plan and any applicable source selection evaluation criteria for antiterrorism (AT) and other related protection matters to include, but not limited to: AT, operations security (OPSEC), information assurance (IA)/cyber security, physical security, law enforcement, intelligence, foreign disclosure.
Army policy requirement: A signed AT/OPSEC cover sheet is required to be included in all requirements package except for supply contracts under the simplified acquisition level threshold, field ordering officer actions and Government purchase card purchases. Command policy may require this form for supply contracts under the simplified acquisition level threshold. Mandatory review and signatures: The organizational Antiterrorism Officer (ATO), OPSEC Officer, Information System Security Manager/Officer, (ISSM/ISSO), Security Manager (SM), and Contracting Officer Representative (COR) must review and sign each requirements package prior to submission to the supporting contracting activity, to include coordination with other staff review, as appropriate per section II below. All signatories must hold the appropriate credentialing as referenced in the associated Army regulation, e.g., AT and OPSEC officers must both be level II certified. If the requiring activity does not have any qualified reviewers, the first functional person in the chain of command will review the contract for each functional consideration. Changes to the security requirements after the functional reviews are completed will void the review and require a subsequent functional review again. Items checked “YES”, apply to this effort. Items checked “NO” are not applicable to this effort and requirements will not be levied against the contractor. Section II.
Standard Contract Language Provision/Contract Clause Text Applicability and/or Additional SOW Language. a. If standard contract or clause language found on page 2 (Section IV) of this form is sufficient to meet specific contract request requirements, check "yes" in block below and include this language in the SOW/PWS. b. If standard contractual text (provisions or clauses) or clause language does not apply, check "no."

The beginning of the document. Download the full file to read on.

Other documents in this bid