Home / Tinker AFB 2026 Multiple Award Construction Contract (MACC) / Document

Attachment 2: Section L Instructions to Offerors

Updated

A PDF document (366 KB) attached to Tinker AFB 2026 Multiple Award Construction Contract (MACC), from the Department of the Air Force. Due Nov 30, 2026, 1:00 PM (UTC-6).

File name: Attachment 2 Section L Instructions to Offerors_10 Nov 26.pdf

Download the full documentSee the bid

The full file is for paid members, or buy this bid alone.

Preview

SECTION L

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

FOR

MULTIPLE AWARD CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT (MACC)

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FA8137-26-R-0040

AIR FORCE SUSTAINMENT CENTER

25 October 2026

FA8137-26-R-0040
Section L
Instructions to Offerors

1.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

The Government plans to award a multiple award indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity (ID/IQ) contract utilizing Highest Technically Rated offerors (HTRO) Minimum Technical Threshold Rating (MTTR) approach. This contract is for general construction services to accomplish a broad range of sustainment, maintenance, repair, alteration/renovation, improvement of buildings, structures, highways and real property. This is a Highest Technically Rated Offerors (HTRO) with Minimum Technical Threshold Rating (MTTR) source selection and is conducted in accordance with Revolutionary FAR Overhaul (RFO) 15.2, as supplemented. The Government anticipates awarding two separate pools, one small business and one full and open. Any small business offeror who wishes to participate in both the small business and the full and open pool must provide a complete proposal for each pool.

1.1

Proposal Compliance. To ensure timely and equitable evaluation of proposals, the Offeror's proposal shall include all data and information requested by these Instructions to Offerors and shall be submitted in accordance with these instructions. The proposal shall be compliant with the requirements as stated in the solicitation for the Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Contract, and all other parts of this solicitation. Non-conformance with the instructions provided may result in an unfavorable proposal evaluation, or rejection of an Offeror’s proposal, rendering it ineligible for award.

1.2

Proposal Clarity. The proposal shall be clear, concise, and shall include sufficient detail for effective evaluation and for substantiating the validity of the claimed points on the Self-Scoring Matrix (Appendix C and/or D to Section L, Self-Scoring Matrix). Offerors shall assume that the Government has no prior knowledge of their experience and will base its evaluation on the information presented in the Offeror's proposal. Offerors shall not submit elaborate brochures or documentation, detailed artwork, or other embellishments.

1.3

RFP Discrepancies/Ambiguities. If an Offeror believes that any portion of this solicitation contains a perceived error, omission, or is otherwise unclear, the Offeror shall immediately contact the Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO) and Contract Specialist via e-mail, clearly describing the portion of the

The beginning of the document. Download the full file to read on.

Other documents in this bid